![]() They also will need something to inspire high end AM4 users to move from their 12 and 16 core chips to the new platform. Kapone32If Intel introduces a HEDT platform for the consumers AMD must respond. May 20th 2023 AMD's Ryzen 7 7800X3D Selling Nearly Twice as Fast as 5800X3D in Some Regions (88)Īdd your own comment 13 Comments on AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7000WX "Storm Peak" Only by Q3-2023 #1 Funnyelevator.May 15th 2023 AMD Ryzen 8000 "Granite Ridge" Zen 5 Processor to Max Out at 16 Cores (110).Oct 17th 2022 AMD Cuts Down Ryzen 7000 "Zen 4" Production As Demand Drops Like a Rock (242).Feb 24th 2023 AMD's Reviewers Guide for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D Leaks (133).Feb 1st 2023 AMD Ryzen 7000X3D Series Prices Revealed, Available Feb 28 (174).Jan 4th 2023 AMD Ryzen 7000X3D Announced, Claims Total Dominance over Intel "Raptor Lake," Upcoming i9-13900KS Deterred (177).Apr 24th 2023 AMD Ryzen 7000X3D Processors Prone to Physical Damage with Voltage-assisted Overclocking, Motherboard Vendors Rush BIOS Updates with Voltage Limiters (258).Jun 14th 2023 AMD Zen 4c Not an E-core, 35% Smaller than Zen 4, but with Identical IPC (135). ![]() Dec 2nd 2022 AMD Readies 16-core, 12-core, and 8-core Ryzen 7000X3D "Zen 4" Processors (153).Jan 5th 2023 AMD Confirms Ryzen 9 7950X3D and 7900X3D Feature 3DV Cache on Only One of the Two Chiplets (164).Zen 3 processors are expected to launch next year. What is confirmed though is that Zen 3 already seems to be running at a higher clock frequency compared to the second generation of Zen. We also know from AMD’s own processor roadmaps that Zen 3 is currently coming along very nicely, as the design has been finished and engineering sample processors are being created.īut according to Chiphell, the processors are now capable of running Windows without crashes or issues, but the processors’ performance isn’t known over Zen 2 (to be clear here, I mean IPC gains from one generation to the next). It’s probable (and this is a pure guess based on what we can see in the benchmark) that Sharktooth (the ThreadRipper 3000 benchmark) is for the more mainstream / prosumer Threadripper SKUs.ĬastlePeak seems to be the name of the ThreadRipper 3000 platform generically, but SharkTooth possibly refers to the more prosumer focused variant, with a different unknown codename for the Workstation/professional line that is due to launch next year. Recently there was also a benchmark leaked for a 32-core engineering sample ThreadRipper 3000 series SKU too. ![]() What isn’t clear yet is how the core count differs between the professional and mainstream line of ThreadRipper. The first product line will see a launch this year, but the ‘professional’ line (for workstations) will launch next year. Leaker ‘ Zoo’ on the infamous ChipHell has leaked that there will be two ThreadRipper product lines. For example, the 4 channel TRX40 would be up to 32 cores, while the TRX80 chipset would go up to 64 cores. I guessed that this would be segmented further by a potentially different socket (possibly physically different), but also it would potentially have different core counts too. I make a prediction in a video that there will be two lines of ThreadRipper then, one which would be 4 memory channels and another which would be 8. The TRX 40 and TRX80 are the interesting ones because it would appear that would be ThreadRipper, and the WRX80 would likely indicate Eypc (which we know has 8 memory channels). Well, recently on the USB.org website there was an interesting update – in the AMD 2019 Premium Chipset entry there were a few interesting changes compared to when I last looked (which at the time was about a week and a half ago, but now closer to two weeks). The challenge became the ThreadRipper platform and how AMD draw the marketing (and product) line between it and AM4. Marketing the AM4 platform, therefore, became about as difficult as marketing the benefits of a bottle of water to someone lost in the desert. ![]() Adobe Premiere, image editing, most development… while certainly more cores are better, for the ‘average’ usage case, 16 cores with decent IPC and clock speed should be sufficient. For a lot of usage scenarios, 16 cores is more than sufficient. The crux of the problem was that 16-cores cores for the mainstream are… well… a lot. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |